DBT documentation differs from standard session notes in a key way: the structure of the treatment determines the structure of the note. DBT has an explicit target hierarchy, a specific assessment tool (the diary card), and a core intervention (chain analysis) that each require their own documentation format. Generic SOAP or BIRP notes don’t capture what DBT treatment actually involves.
Short answer: DBT individual sessions require diary card review documentation, target hierarchy documentation (which level was addressed and why), and — if a target behavior occurred — a full chain analysis. Skills training groups require a group note plus an individual addendum for each member. The diary card is a clinical document; not documenting its review is a documentation gap.
DBT Has Two Clinical Contexts
| Context | Who runs it | What to document |
|---|---|---|
| Individual DBT therapy | Individual therapist | Diary card review, target hierarchy, chain analysis, skills, phone coaching |
| DBT skills training group | Skills trainers (separate from individual therapist in standard DBT) | Group note + individual addendum per member |
In standard DBT, the individual therapist and skills trainers are different people. The individual therapist has access to the full clinical picture; skills trainers document only what they observe in group.
The Diary Card: A Clinical Document
The DBT diary card is not homework — it’s a clinical assessment tool. Documenting the diary card review is part of the standard of care.
DIARY CARD REVIEW
Card completed: □ Yes □ Partially □ No — reason: __________
Days tracked: ___ / 7
Target behaviors this week:
Suicidal ideation (0-5 scale): Mon__ Tue__ Wed__ Thu__ Fri__ Sat__ Sun__
NSSI: □ None □ Episodes: ___________________________________
Urges (highest this week): SI urge ___ NSSI urge ___
Misery rating (0-5): ___
Skills used (from card): □ Yes □ No Details: _______________
Medications taken as prescribed: □ Yes □ No □ N/A
Highest-priority item on card: __________________________________
Addressed this session: □ Yes □ No — reason: _________________
DBT Target Hierarchy: Document Which Level You Addressed
Every DBT session note should reflect the treatment hierarchy:
DBT TARGET HIERARCHY — THIS SESSION
1. Life-threatening behaviors (suicidal/homicidal behavior, NSSI)
Present this week: □ No □ Yes: _________________________
Addressed: □ Yes □ N/A
2. Therapy-interfering behaviors (TIBs)
Present: □ No □ Yes: __________________________________
(TIBs = behaviors that disrupt therapy — late cancellations,
not completing diary card, dissociation in session, etc.)
Addressed: □ Yes □ No — reason: _______________________
3. Quality-of-life behaviors
Focus this session: ______________________________________
4. Skills acquisition / generalization
Skills targeted: ________________________________________
SESSION FOCUS (highest-priority item addressed):
□ Level 1 — life-threatening behavior
□ Level 2 — therapy-interfering behavior
□ Level 3 — quality-of-life target: ________________________
□ Level 4 — skills work
Chain Analysis: Full Template
The chain analysis is the core individual DBT intervention. Document it in full when a target behavior occurred.
CHAIN ANALYSIS
TARGET BEHAVIOR: ___________________________________________
Date/time of behavior: ______________________________________
Severity / specifics: _______________________________________
1. VULNERABILITY FACTORS
(What made client more susceptible that day?)
Physical: □ Poor sleep □ Illness □ Substances □ Skipped meds
□ Hunger/fatigue □ Other: _______________________
Emotional: ________________________________________________
Recent stressors: __________________________________________
2. PROMPTING EVENT
(The specific event that started the chain — concrete, behavioral)
What happened: ____________________________________________
When: ____ Where: ____ Who was involved: _________________
3. LINKS
(The chain of thoughts, feelings, sensations, behaviors between
prompting event and target behavior — be specific)
Link 1: [Thought / feeling / sensation / behavior]
→ Link 2:
→ Link 3:
→ Link 4:
→ Link 5:
→ [Continue as needed]
4. TARGET BEHAVIOR
What exactly happened: _____________________________________
Duration: ___ Intensity: ___
5. CONSEQUENCES
Immediate consequences: ____________________________________
Reinforcing consequences: __________________________________
(What made the behavior more likely to happen again?)
Short-term relief / escape: _________________________________
SKILLS GAPS IDENTIFIED (where could a skill have broken the chain?)
After Link ___: Skill that could have been used: _____________
After Link ___: Skill that could have been used: _____________
SOLUTION ANALYSIS
Skills to practice before next session: _____________________
Commitment from client: ____________________________________
Individual DBT Session Note Template
DATE: _______ SESSION #: ___ DURATION: ___ min
FORMAT: □ In-person □ Telehealth
DIARY CARD REVIEW
[See diary card section above]
TARGET HIERARCHY
[Document which level was addressed — see hierarchy template]
CHAIN ANALYSIS (if target behavior occurred)
[See chain analysis template above]
SKILLS WORK
Skills reviewed from last session: __________________________
Client's practice between sessions: ________________________
New skill introduced / practiced this session: _______________
Skills coaching strategies used: □ Validation □ Cheerleading
□ Problem-solving □ Other: _
DIALECTICAL STRATEGIES / VALIDATION
Validation level(s) used: □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6
Dialectical strategy: □ Devil's advocate □ Wise mind
□ Extending □ Other: ________________
COMMITMENT WORK
Commitment elicited: □ Yes □ No □ N/A
Content: _________________________________________________
RISK ASSESSMENT
SI: □ None □ Passive □ Active — plan: ____________________
NSSI urges: □ None □ Present: ____________________________
Safety plan reviewed: □ No □ Yes □ Updated
PHONE COACHING AGREEMENT
□ No changes □ Updated: __________________________________
Calls this week: ___ Content: _____________________________
PLAN
Next session focus (if no new crisis): ______________________
Skills assignment: _________________________________________
DBT Skills Training Group Note
Group Note
DATE: _______ SESSION #: ___ MODULE: ____________________
(Mindfulness / Distress Tolerance / Emotion Regulation / IE)
Skill(s) taught: ___________________________________________
Trainers: _________________________________________________
Members present: ___ / ___ Members absent: ________________
TEACHING METHOD
□ Didactic □ Whiteboard □ Roleplay □ Worksheet □ Video
□ Mindfulness exercise: ____________________________________
GROUP PROCESS
Participation level: □ High □ Moderate □ Low
Group dynamics: ___________________________________________
Significant moments (anonymized): __________________________
GROUP-LEVEL SAFETY
□ No safety concerns at group level
□ Concern: _______________________________________________
Action taken: ___________________________________________
PLAN
Next session: Module ___ / Skill: __________________________
Homework assigned: ________________________________________
Individual Addendum (per member)
MEMBER: _________ SESSION: ___ DATE: ___________
HOMEWORK REVIEW
Assigned: ________________________________________________
Completed: □ Yes □ Partially □ No
What happened (if practiced): ______________________________
Obstacle if not practiced: _________________________________
PARTICIPATION THIS SESSION
Level: □ Active □ Moderate □ Minimal □ Absent
Specific contribution: _____________________________________
Skill application observed: ________________________________
CLINICAL CONCERNS
□ None □ Safety: _________________________________________
□ Therapy-interfering behavior in group: ___________________
□ Referral to individual therapist: □ Yes □ No
PLAN
□ No follow-up needed
□ Contact individual therapist: ___________________________
□ Outreach before next group: _____________________________
Filled Example: Chain Analysis
Client: 26F, BPD diagnosis, 8 months of standard DBT. Target behavior: NSSI (cutting, superficial) — occurred Tuesday evening.
Target behavior: NSSI (superficial cutting, left forearm, 3 cuts). Tuesday at approximately 9:30 PM.
Vulnerability factors:
- Physical: 4 hours of sleep previous night (stayed up after conflict with roommate); skipped dinner; no mindfulness practice in 3 days.
- Emotional: residual shame from previous week’s session (chain analysis on prior NSSI felt “humiliating”).
- Recent stressors: upcoming performance review at work (Thursday); roommate conflict Monday.
Prompting event: Tuesday 7:15 PM — text from roommate saying “we need to talk” with no further explanation. Client interpreted this as confirmation that roommate wants her to move out.
Chain:
- (Thought) “She’s going to kick me out. I knew this was coming.” → (Emotion) fear + shame spike
- (Behavior) Attempted to text roommate back, no response for 40 minutes → (Emotion) fear escalated to terror; (Thought) “Silence means the worst”
- (Behavior) Googled “how to find emergency housing” → (Emotion) overwhelm; (Thought) “I can’t handle this”
- (Thought) “I ruin everything. I’m going to be alone forever.” → (Emotion) shame intensified; dissociative symptoms (zoning out, “watching myself from above”)
- (Behavior) Went to bathroom, retrieved razor kept “for emergencies” → urge intensity 8/10
- (Target behavior) NSSI — cutting. Immediate relief from dissociation; brief reduction in emotional pain.
Consequences: Immediate — emotional pain reduced from 9/10 to 4/10; returned to “present.” Reinforcing consequence — avoidance of thinking about housing situation. Later consequence — shame about NSSI; hid cuts from roommate when she finally called (roommate wanted to talk about shared grocery expenses — not eviction).
Skills gaps:
- After Link 2: TIPP skills (Temperature — ice water) — not attempted. Client stated “I forgot.” Last practiced in session 3.
- After Link 4: Opposite Action (acting opposite to shame — reaching out instead of isolating) — not attempted. Client stated “It felt impossible.”
Solution analysis: Re-practice TIPP this session. Client commits to putting ice pack in freezer as environmental prompt. Agreed to remove razor from bathroom before next session — environmental control. Phone coaching agreement reviewed: client will call if urge reaches 6/10 before acting.
Filled Example: Skills Training Group Note
Group: Emotion Regulation module, Session 4 of 8. “Checking the Facts” skill. 7 members present, 1 absent.
Group note:
Skill taught: Checking the Facts (Emotion Regulation) — identifying whether emotion fits the facts, and whether its intensity fits the facts.
Teaching method: Didactic introduction (10 min), whiteboard mapping of “emotion → assumed facts → actual facts” with group-generated examples (20 min), paired practice with worksheet (15 min), debrief (10 min).
Group process: High engagement. First half of session: two members dominated discussion with personal examples — gently redirected twice without disrupting group flow. Second half: paired practice produced strong participation from typically quieter members. One member (M.) appeared visibly distressed during the “shame” example used in didactic portion — monitored, no crisis intervention needed, made note to flag to individual therapist.
Group-level safety: No crisis. Member M. — distress response to shame example — monitoring note to individual therapist.
Homework: Complete “Checking the Facts” worksheet for one emotion experienced this week.
Individual addendum — Member T.:
Homework (Opposite Action from last session): Partially completed. Practiced 2 of 3 assigned situations. Did not practice in family context — stated “the situation didn’t come up.” Identified this as avoidance in debrief.
Participation: Active. Offered example from work situation that was well-used by group. Demonstrated understanding of skill distinction (emotion fits facts vs. intensity fits facts).
Clinical concerns: None.
In TheraMemory, the client card’s «Important Information» section is a practical place to store the client’s current DBT stage, active target from the hierarchy, current module in skills group, and primary chain links from recent analyses — visible at the start of every session without reconstructing from notes.
See Also
- PIE Notes for Therapists
- SOAP vs DAP Notes
- Progress Notes vs Process Notes
- BIRP Notes for Group Therapy
- Grief Therapy Session Notes
Try TheraMemory free for 14 days
DBT stage, current hierarchy target, and active chain links stored in the client card — visible at every session. Session chronology tracks behavioral patterns across the full course of DBT treatment.
Start free